Any computer assistance needs critical thinking to be used. I would add, like anything else.
This is no exception, and you will need it to evaluate the suggestions.
Wikipedia Portuguese committe/bureaucrats prefer "minimal corrections", and that grant was foiled. They are using only the same replacement scripts they have been using for years ("dumb replacements"). They are similar to this:
Regarless, a great deal of work has been done on that area, although I am not working on a pseudo-chunker via disambiguation.
Other teams, after a decade of development still remove false positives. If you need extra precision, maybe better to check back in 10 years from now.
This can be done regardless.