Melissa shook her head to that request as “your tuning of the piano turned Brahms Wiegenlied into a bass song, so I’d rather not have your help.”
this sentence should not trigger the your vs you’re rule. (I think you should test for VERB + ‘of’)
Melissa shook her head to that request as “your tuning of the piano turned Brahms Wiegenlied into a bass song, so I’d rather not have your help.”
this sentence should not trigger the your vs you’re rule. (I think you should test for VERB + ‘of’)
I could not correct this problem. Refer to the new examples in the first rule in rulegroup id=“YOUR” ([en] Improve disambiguation PRPPOSS_VB_NN_VBZ and grammar YOUR · languagetool-org/languagetool@ded5d77 · GitHub).
I am having this issue repeatedly in English. Whenever a continued present tense verb is used as a noun. It seems to confuse this with the continued present tense participle (using my high school French or English as second language grammar lingo). In which case, it would be right.
Have this been solved? I found another thread about “your you’re” in topic title.
Difference between “you’re” and “your” and “Check/Cheque” (languagetool.org) Jul '15
Are there others?
optional request of conversation. (from tangible).
Is the grammar using constructive AI, or does it also use NN? type of language machines? I am new to how NN are used under the hood, for strings and their context dependencies at distance. But this might be of a constructive model type of problem. Identifying where the same word is used in a grammatical local relationship as a name or a verb, or is it that, it is of semantic “ambient” context dependent nature? Yes also curious about filling in some conceptual gaps of mine. Usiing Q and A as a fastworward way, if that works.