I have spent two days working in a feature for Proofing Tool GUI that allows to have a master wordlist and other lists and analyse them to check which entries are missing in the master.
I am sending you a list of 476 uncountable nouns missing in the English added.txt, taken from my GB speller morphologic data (ongoing).
Please add it to the added.txt when you have the time, but be sure to see if it matches what is planned.
The uncountable nouns are basically based on Wiktionary, since it is the only dictionary that states “uncountable”.
The other dictionaries just say “Mass Noun” but then they have examples that use plural (like the Oxford one to which I have a Premium account, so I can’t trust Oxford on that).
I agree: mass nouns vs. count nouns is the same distinction as countable nouns vs. uncountable nouns.
A question for clarifying: If we mark a word as being “uncountable”, does that mean “it can be used as a mass noun” or “it can only be used as a mass noun”?
I am asking because many nouns can be used both countably and uncountably.
Your picture needs more colour. (mass noun)
This screen can only display four colours. (count noun)
There was still some beer in the glass. (mass noun)
Can I take a Nyquil when I’ve had two beers? (count noun)
@marcoagpinto, thank you very much for the data! I’ve scrolled through it. Yours is a list of exclusively uncountable nouns and I haven’t found any errors in it. I was thinking whether having several “infowars” was a possibility (maybe because of Alex Jones’… “well-known” website). And maybe in semiotics, having several “semioses” is a possibility. So maybe those two are candidates for an NN:UN tag.
@Mike_Unwalla, thank you for the reminder, I am aware of the tagset. My question was basically answered by looking at the list: It’s a list of purely uncountable words.