Hello @rjlima
Just a small idea I had for a basic rule for PhD theses and scientific texts:
If it finds:
para concluir (maybe check for verb “concluir” to use in all persons)
para concluirmos
resumidamente
It suggests replacing with:
em suma
Being restricted to sentences ending with “,” or “:”, to remove false positives.
<message>Se for um texto académico/científico, pondere melhorar a linguagem.</message>
Is it a good idea?
Thanks!
A similar rule:
“A Ana percebeu exatamente o contrário!”
Suggest replacing “contrário” with “oposto”.
V.+ AND RM AND “o” AND “contrário”
I believe there won’t be false positives in such a rule.
Thanks!
I vote for both! In the second, is ‘exatamente’ going to remain? Maybe a good idea to remove it!?
That was the idea:
“A Ana percebeu EXATAMENTE o oposto.”
However “exatamente” has the POS “RM” so it should give hits with similar words.
Ahhh… should it be removed?
Thanks!
Ricardo,
I have coded the EM_SUMA and attached the hits iin the commit:
They all seem valid.
I have coded the CONTRÁRIO_OPOSTO rule:
I have attached there the results.
Are they all valid?
Thanks!
They are!